The Liminalist # 34: A Royal Split (with Random Dude)

RandomDude1

First part of a return conversation with Random Dude, on Quakerism, radical beginnings, belief in human goodness vs. belief in human wickedness, was Jesus good?, taking down social icons, Plato & secret societies, the Jekyll & Hyde archetype, inverting “good” & “evil,” the power of taboo, a Lucifer ritual, the Christian shadow, the push to integrate everything, far right leaders, creative conflict, the liminal space of mental institutions, conflict between group & individual, MKULTRA & DARPA, Hermeticism, Jimmy Savile at Broadmore, the outing of Savile and possible agenda behind current UK revelations, the normalization of child abuse, the predator’s disguise, psychological warfare and epistemic disorientation, false polarization during liminality, the destabilization agenda, a nation triggered, 4th generation warfare, the sacred pinnacle of the individual, how transgenderism is stealing women’s voices, society as laboratory, the power block pendulum, the psychological and biological principals of social engineering, gender politics and ideological purges, the underlying mechanism of victimization, sovereignty, the paradox of taboo-breaking, good-living in a corrupt society, containing the world, getting back to kings, the Enlightenment, embodying the lawmaker, reason & the Id, the guardian’s control system, the goal of no-end, the fundamental split, John de Ruiter, symbiotic slavery, the royal cloak, sick reciprocity, truth at an ego level, the secret gizmo of transhumanism, purity & impurity, the drive for wholeness as a drive for annihilation, primordial drives to get back to the womb, recognizing the split, strengthening the soul-signal, the end of the quest.

Songs: “El Mariachi,” by The Freak Fandango Orchestra; “20 to 48 Hours,” by Party People in the Can

5 thoughts on “The Liminalist # 34: A Royal Split (with Random Dude)”

    • Why is he talking about ISIS & then about freedom and democracy as if the former wasn’t created by the “defenders” of the latter?

      Reply
      • I agree with your assesment, and he could be somekind of disinfo agent himself, or try to stay PC there, but his general theory is interesting nonetheless. Especially with the UN presenting its Agenda 2021 / 2030 in these weeks.

        Reply

Leave a Comment