The War on Human Sentience: 2021 ~ the Year Humanity Consented to Euthanized Eugenocide?

A friend of a friend recently took the Pfizer vaccine. When they were questioned on the wisdom of their decision, they replied that they felt they had made an intelligent, adult decision. Let’s see if that’s true.

The Rise of Nanontechnocracy

From July, 2020:

From mRNA vaccines entering clinical trials, to peptide-based vaccines and using molecular farming to scale vaccine production, the COVID-19 pandemic is pushing new and emerging nanotechnologies into the frontlines and the headlines. . . . Steinmetz is leading a National Science Foundation-funded effort to develop – using a plant virus – a stable, easy to manufacture COVID-19 vaccine patch that can be shipped around the world and painlessly self-administered by patients. Both the vaccine itself and the microneedle patch delivery platform rely on nanotechnology. This vaccine falls into the peptide-based approach described below.

“From a vaccine technology development point of view, this is an exciting time and novel technologies and approaches are poised to make a clinical impact for the first time. For example, to date, no mRNA vaccine has been clinically approved, yet Moderna’s [an American pharmaceutical and biotechnology company] mRNA vaccine technology for COVID-19 is making headways and was the first vaccine to enter clinical testing in the US.”

As of June 1, there are 157 COVID-19 vaccine candidates in development, with 12 in clinical trials.

“. . . as devastating as COVID-19 is, it may serve as an impetus for the scientific community, funding bodies, and stakeholders to put more focused efforts toward development of platform technologies to prepare nations for readiness for future pandemics,” Steinmetz wrote.

As crisis looms, opportunity knocks for nanotechs. . . Flash-forward to November 9, 2020:

The pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced in a company press release a Covid19 vaccine that was “90% effective.” The EU promptly announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine. Meanwhile Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, sold 62% of his stock in Pfizer on the day the proposed vaccine trials were announced. He made millions on the deal, done via “a special option” in August to avoid charges of insider trading, and timed it just after the US elections and the mainstream media declared Joe Biden President-elect (i.e., during a media shitstorm when everyone was distracted).

As F.William Engdahl wrote in Nov, 2020:

Pfizer, famous for its Viagra and other drugs, has partnered with a small Mainz, Germany company, BioNTech, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine. BioNTech was only founded in 2008. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September, 2019, just before announcement in Wuhan China of the Novel Coronavirus and just before BioNTech made its stock market debut. The agreement involved cooperation on developing new mRNA techniques to treat cancer and HIV. Curiously that press release, “The Gates Foundation sees BioNTech potential to ‘dramatically reduce global HIV and tuberculosis’” 05. September 2019, has now been deleted.

BioNTech also has an agreement with one of the largest drug producers in China, Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (“Fosun Pharma”) to develop a version of its mRNA vaccine for novel coronavirus for the Chinese market. . . . This means that the same German biotech company is behind the covid vaccines being rushed out in China as well as the USA and EU. . . . Both US and EU authorities and presumably also Chinese, waived the standard animal tests using ferrets or mice and have gone straight to human “guinea pigs.” Human tests began in late July and early August. Three months is unheard of for testing a new vaccine. Several years is the norm. . . . Vaccine makers all have legal indemnity, meaning they can’t be sued if people die or are maimed from the new vaccine. But the most alarming fact about the new Pfizer-BioNTech gene edited vaccine is that the gene edited mRNA for human vaccine application has never before been approved. Notably, two year peer reviewed tests with mice fed genetically modified corn sprayed with Monsanto glyphosate-rich Roundup first showed cancer tumors after nine months as well as liver and other organ damage. Earlier Monsanto company tests ended at three months and claimed no harm. A similar situation exists with the gene edited mRNA vaccines that are being rushed out after less than 90 days human tests.

Dr. Michael Yeadon (who has a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research-based PhD in pharmacology, spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, and was a VP at Pfizer) has stated, “If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for . . . whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.”

Despite the fact the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is experimental and therefore guaranteed unsafe, it has at date of writing been given to over a hundred million humans, with hundreds of millions more due to receive the jab in the next few months.

F.William Engdahl continues:

The experimental technology is based on a rather new gene manipulation known as gene editing. In a major article in the 2018 New York Council on Foreign Relations magazine, Foreign Affairs, Bill Gates effusively promoted the novel gene editing CRISPR technology as being able to “transform global development.” He noted that his Gates Foundation had been financing gene editing developments for vaccines and other applications for a decade.

Dr. Romeo Quijano, retired professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, has warned of

the danger that the vaccine might actually “enhance” the pathogenicity of the virus, or make it more aggressive possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), as what happened with previous studies on test vaccines in animals. If that should happen in a major human trial the outcome could be disastrous. This serious adverse effect may not even be detected by a clinical trial especially in highly biased clinical trials laden with conflicts of interest involving vaccine companies. Even when a serious adverse event is detected, this is usually swept under the rug.”

Quijano writes in the extensively documented article, “among other dangers, the virus-vectored vaccines could undergo recombination with naturally occurring viruses and produce hybrid viruses that could have undesirable properties affecting transmission or virulence. The . . . possible outcomes of recombination are practically impossible to quantify accurately given existing tools and knowledge. The risks, however, are real, as exemplified by the emergence of mutant types of viruses, enhanced pathogenicity and unexpected serious adverse events (including death) following haphazard mass vaccination campaigns and previous failed attempts to develop chimeric vaccines using genetic engineering technology.”


Faith-Based Denials from the Science Alliance

December 2020:

Former Pfizer head of respiratory research, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and the former head of the public health department, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, have filed a petition for a stay of action asking the European Medicine Agency to suspend phase III of the clinical trials for Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and all other clinical trials. They site “significant” safety concerns and request all trials are halted until specific criteria outlined in their stay action is met which will ensure efficiency and safety.

Yeadon and Wodarg claim that it’s not only possible the vaccine could provoke serious unwanted antibody and immune reactions, but it must be “absolutely ruled out” that the vaccine would not render women infertile by disrupting their placentas, should they become pregnant.


Snopes has of course denied this (though not that Yeadon said it). For every awkward fact presented around the untested nature (and hence lack of safety) of the Pfizer implant, there are a hundred denials. Yet no one can deny the fact that it has not been tested and hence is provably unsafe. The denials are faith- not fact-based, though it seems that many of the people who make them ~ those sincerely intended at least ~ are unaware that they are using religio-magical thinking (a.k.a. doublethink) to maintain their opinions. They sincerely believe they have corporate-medical science on their side. Unfounded and ideologically-driven opinion has truly trumped arguments, evidence, facts, and, the last and most critical casualty in this war on human sentience, truth.

In case anyone says this post isn’t presenting a balanced perspective, here’s Alliance for Science (Cornell), who are fighting on the front line of the pro-mRNA movement (Dec 2021, “Yes, some COVID vaccines use genetic engineering. Get over it“):

We’re going right to the heart of the matter. So no, COVID-19 vaccines aren’t delivery vehicles for government microchips. They aren’t tainted by material from aborted fetuses. And they won’t turn us into GMOs — though some of them do use genetic engineering, and all of them use genetics more broadly. We think this is way cool — something to celebrate, not shy away from. So, we’re doing the deep reveal on exactly how genetics and biotechnology have been a central component of the vaccine effort. Because we know the conspiracists don’t care about evidence, anyway. First up: mRNA. It won’t reprogram your brain. But it does reprogram some of your cells, in a manner of speaking. And that’s not a defect — it’s intentional.

January 2021:

Norway said Covid-19 vaccines may be too risky for the very old and terminally ill, the most cautious statement yet from a European health authority as countries assess the real-world side effects of the first shots to gain approval.
Norwegian officials said 23 people had died in the country a short time after receiving their first dose of the vaccine. Of those deaths, 13 have been autopsied, with the results suggesting that common side effects may have contributed to severe reactions in frail, elderly people, according to the Norwegian Medicines Agency.

“For those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences,” the Norwegian Institute of Public Health said. “For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant.”

But don’t worry:

“the number of incidents so far is not alarming, and in line with expectations,” Pfizer said.


Revenge of the Brain-Eaters

So who needs conspiracy-theorists when you have a growing number of alarmed medical, biological, and technical professionals vainly trying to sound the alarm? Not that it matters, since Science, big S, no longer cares about facts but only bottom dollar. This is British Columbia-based Chris Shaw, Ph.D, Specialist in Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology:

“The mRNA lipid-coated PEG-construct––by Moderna’s own study––does not stay localized but spreads throughout the body, including the brain. Found in animal studies in bone marrow, brain, lymph nodes, heart, kidneys liver, lungs, etc. Doctors are saying that the vaccine does not cross the blood-brain barrier, but that is not true. . . . If it reaches the brain, there will be an auto-immune response that will cause inflammation. What characterizes virtually all neuro-degenerative diseases is this misfolded protein that is characteristic to Lou Gerrig’s disease, to Alzheimer’s, to Parkinson’s to Huntington’s, etc. They are different proteins, but they tend to form these sheets of misfolded proteins called Beta Sheets. Now you are asking cells in various parts of the body––including the brain––to make a lot of these proteins and release them to the outside, and , are we sure that’s what it’s all doing? Are you getting clusters of misfolded proteins inside neurons? That would be a bad thing to do. So you’d like to know where it is, how much of it there is, and which groups of neuronal groups it’s targeted. And those are the kinds of questions you like the companies to have solved long before they got authorization and discovered, some years later, that they have a problem.”

“This is a vast experiment that should have been done in the lab on animals and now it is being done on people . . . The potential is that you are going to harm a lot of people while you do this experiment.”

From video interview at “NEUROSCIENTIST’S CONCERNS ABOUT COVID VACCINES” Also quoted in “Vaccine Diabolus and the Impending Wave of Rare Neurodegenerative Disorders.”

Is it getting dark enough to see the light? Is it time to return to that transcript from a Rudolf Steiner lecture on “The Fall of the Spirits of Darkness,” from 1917?

The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present; for it makes no difference to their reality whether they are recognized or unrecognized. . . . I have told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts in whom they will be dwelling to find a vaccine that will drive all inclination towards spirituality out of people’s souls when they are still very young, and this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body. . . . The whole trend goes in a direction where a way will finally be found to vaccinate bodies so that these bodies will not allow the inclination toward spiritual ideas to develop, and all their lives people will believe only in the physical world they perceive with the senses . . .

A Vast Experiment (& The Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation)

March 11, 2021:

A group of scientists and doctors has today issued an open letter calling on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to answer urgent safety questions regarding COVID-19 vaccines, or withdraw the vaccines’ authorisation.

The letter describes serious potential consequences of COVID-19 vaccine technology, warning of possible autoimmune reactions, blood clotting abnormalities, stroke and internal bleeding, “including in the brain, spinal cord and heart.”

The authors request evidence that each medical danger outlined “was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.”

“Should all such evidence not be available”, the authors write, “we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.”

The letter is addressed to Emer Cooke, Executive Director of the EMA, and was sent on Monday 1 March 2021. The letter was copied to the President of the Council of Europe and the President of the European Commission.

It states that “the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute ‘human experimentation’, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.” It presents new data showing that “vaccine side effects are three times as common in those who have previously been infected with coronavirus.”

It aims to “enumerate and evaluate all deaths which have occurred within 28 days of vaccination, and to compare the clinical pictures with those who have not been vaccinated.”

Under Resolution 2361, member states must also inform citizens that vaccination is NOT mandatory and ensure that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to become vaccinated. States are further required to ensure that no one is discriminated against for not receiving the vaccine.

The letter comes as a petition against UK Government plans for vaccine passports passed 270,000 signatures, more than double that required to compel consideration for debate by MPs. The petition will be debated in the UK Parliament on 15th March 2021.

Render Not Lest Ye Be Rendered

As I have spoken about on this week’s two podcasts, no decision that is the result of deception, coercion, implied threat of ostracization or loss of freedoms, and the sustained manipulation of fight-or flight reactions, can be seen as adult or intelligent, or in any way sensible.

The above data (with the assist of a reader who emailed me some of these links) has been gathered and presented within the space of a single morning and half an afternoon. It did not require enormous amounts of time, energy, or effort to see that something is deeply wrong around the technocratic spellcraft of the Pfizer nano-implant genetic experiment, or that a person would have to be be practicing less discernment than a five-year-old let loose in a candy store to have to submit to such a program. But sadly, when fear drives, the devil rides ~ anyone who bows down or bends over to be mounted.

However, the point I am making here is a subtler one. Regardless of the actual effects and consequences of this worldwide experimentation program (and that’s being charitable, since it far more closely resembles a carefully orchestrated program of eugenocide); and apart from from the social and political implications it has for every last soul on this planet; for individual human beings to consent to such a shadowy agenda, in so trusting, docile, and slavish a manner, presents the most damning evidence possible for the future of humanity.

If this is what is really happening, then humans are doing what lemmings were only rumored, falsely, to have done, and becoming the first species ever to commit mass-suicide.

In the New Order of the New Barbarians (recalled by Lawrence Dunegan from a 1969 talk he attended by Dr. Richard Day), Dunegan recalls:

Anybody who was lazy enough to want the convenience foods rather than fixing his own also had better be energetic enough to exercise. Because if he was too lazy to exercise and too lazy to fix his own food, then he didn’t deserve to live very long. This was all presented as sort of a moral judgment about people and what they should do with their energies. People who are smart, who would learn about nutrition, and who are disciplined enough to eat right and exercise right are better people – are the kind you want to live longer.

I mention it now because it is hard, for me at least, not to agree with our social engineers on this point. If a person is too lazy to perform due diligence around the current sociopolitical, industrial-medical drive to submit to a grand “vaccination” program; if they are so out of tune with their own instincts and common-sensical distrust for the institutional powers that are serving us (up to the slaughter) ~ aren’t they getting exactly what they are asking for? This probably seems harsh, and maybe it is. But maybe less so if we consider that those who are complying with the forced vaccination eugenocidal agenda are themselves becoming foot soldiers in the war on human sentience. What they do to themselves, they do to us all.

Consider also that such people are, often enough, also arguing for the sanity and sanctity of the establishment solution, aren’t they thereby, implicitly or explicitly, also encouraging, even pressuring, others to go along with the diabolic drive? I can extend such souls my pity, but not my sympathy. At the same time, though such willful self-destructive action exhausts the reserves of my compassion (“Take my compassion, push it as far as it goes!“), I have no choice but to empathize, just as I have no choice but to empathize with sheep that are slaughtered. Because as one with the Human Energy Field, every last confused and lost soul is also my body and blood. And the latter may be nearing boiling point.

My point is that the manufactured mass consent to malevolent agendas and spiritual darkness under the guise of salvation (move one letter and you get slavation) is more deeply disturbing to me than the apparently eugenocidal program that is being consented to.  Millions of people are currently making a life-defining decision that centers around a choice to live or die ~ literally to those who believe the Pfizer implant will save them, and others, from a “pandemic.” Their decision entails handing over their bodies, their health, their immune systems, their very DNA (ancestry and genealogy), allowing the surface of their skins to be penetrated by an unknown agent, manufactured by unknown intelligences, for undisclosed but provably unethical purposes, purely on “faith.”

Their faith is in Mammon, not in God. It is faith that the political and social forces have their interests at heart, and to believe this in 2021, with all the evidence amassed against it, is to go so fully and utterly against one’s own felt, intuitive, instinctive, and bodily sense of what is good and right, as to essentially align oneself with insentience and insensibility, in favor of and an abject dependence on the very forces that are oppressing us.

Isn’t this the programmed behavior of human livestock? Isn’t it time for the goats to separate themselves out from the sheep, and admit that we are better off without a shepherd?

In terms of world history, it is indecent for people to base their judgment on the very ideas which have led to present events, when those events clearly show them to have been wrong. Do people think they can cure the ills of the present time by applying the same principles which have brought them about? If so, they are utterly deceiving themselves.
~ Rudolf Steiner, 1917

Further resources:

US CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

Harvard Report on Vaccine Injuries

UK Covid Adverse Event Reporting System

VAERS Med Alerts


Nuremberg Code is Your Vaccine Defence

US CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

Harvard Report on Vaccine Injuries


Vaccine Technology:


Worrying Signs That New Covid Strains Are Mutating the Spike Protein to Defeat Existing Vaccines


The AstraZeneca Vaccine DNA Plasmids Are Designed to Penetrate the Cell Nucleus – Get Over It ! But It Doesnt Alter Your Genome (Bwah ha ha )


The Astra Zeneca Vax Uses Double Stranded DNA (NotMRNA) to Deliver Genetic Spike Protein Instructions, Doesnt Work, Countries Already Rejecting It


How the Astra Zeneca Vax Works , Possible Future Developments 


Why RNA Vaccines for Covid19 Raced to the Front of the Pack


Covid19 – How do  Viral Vector Vaccines Work


How the Oxford AstraZeneca Covid19 Vaccine Was Made


How the Oxford AstraZeneca Vaccine Works


Nanotechnology Plays Major Role in Covid19 Vaccine Development


Thailand Halts AZ Vaccine

Thailand Halts AstraZeneca Vaccinations Following Concerns in Europe


Group of Scientists and Doctors Write to European Medicines Agency Seeking Urgent Clarification on Covid Vaccine Side Effects

Blood Clotting, Stroke and Internal Bleeding in Brain, Spinal Cord and Heart


Denmark Norway Iceland Join Austria to Suspend AZ Vaccine After Thromboembolic Blood Clotting Incidents

7 countries plus Austria = 8 Have halted AZ


One Nurse Dead and Another Injured as Austria Suspends AZ Covid Vax

One Nurse Dead and Another One Injured as Austria Suspends AstraZeneca COVID Vaccine Inoculations


39 y.o Dies After Second Moderna Shot. Family Comissions Own Autopsy After Being Refused

39-Year-Old Woman Dies 4 Days After Second Moderna Vaccine, Autopsy Ordered


Gardasil Correlation With US Female Fertility Declines ??

Is Gardasil Vaccine Linked to Record Birth Rate Declines?


47% of After-Vaxx Deaths Occur Within 48 Hours , 20% Cardiac Related – VAERS

COVID Vaccine Injury Reports Grow in Number, But Trends Remain Consistent


463 Deaths 240 Injuries From Covid Vaccines in UK

460 Dead 243,612 Reported Injuries from COVID-19 Vaccines Reported in the U.K.


Five Koreans Die After Astra Zeneca Vaccination

Five Koreans die after AstraZeneca vaccination


VAERS Updates 19907 incidents, 1065 deaths , 3767 Serious Injuries

Number of Injuries Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Climbs by Nearly 4,000 in One Week


Risk Benefit Analysis of MRNA Vaccines & Dodgy Effcacy Methodology – Dr Sadaf Gilani

Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis


Summary of Medical Experts Concerns About Untried MRNA Vaccine Acute & Systemic Effects


German Clinics Halt Administration of Astra Zeneca Vaccine After 37/88 Ambulance Workers Report Feeling Unwell. Areas of Sweden Experiencing Same Problem


VAERS 15923 injuries & 929 Deaths Following CovidVax

One-Third of Deaths Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Occurred Within 48 Hours of Vaccination


Who Pays Compensation in Australia For Covid Vaccination Injuries ?


Five Questions To Ask People Before They Get Vaxxed

5 Questions To Ask Your Friends Who Plan To Get The Covid Vaccine


About A Third of US Troops Have Turned Down the Covid Vaccine


Detroit TV Anchor Karen Hudson-Samuels Dies A Day After Taking Covid Vaccine

Former Detroit TV Anchor Karen Hudson-Samuels Dies One Day After Taking COVID Vaccine


Roundup Up of Elderly Deaths Around the World Following Covid Vaccinations

46 Residents in Spanish Nursing Home Die after Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine


Doubts Exist Over the Possibility of ADE / VAH Reactions Following Vaccination

Vaccine Transparency: Why Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) Might be a Ticking Time Bomb


List of Risks Associated With MRNA Vaccines


653 Deaths & 12044 Other Injuries After Covid Vaccination, CDC VAERS DataBase Shows

653 Deaths + 12,044 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show


Covid Vaccines May Be Triggering Blood Disorder Adverse Events


German Company BioNTech Behind Both Pfizer & Chinese Vaccines. Dr Romero Quijano on the Problems & Dangers of MRNA Tech

What’s Not Being Said About the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine. “Human Guinea Pigs”?


VAERS & its UK and EU Equivalent Shows Close to 1000 Post Covid Vax Deaths

Covid Vaccines: Post-Vaccination Deaths


Vice Article Responds to VAERS Cherry Picking Data Claims With Some Cherry Picked Data


Covid MRNA ‘Vaccines’ Are Therapeutic Drugs At Best

When “Vaccines” are Not Vaccines: Believe Biotech Corporations When They Tell You


501 Deaths & 11,249 Vaccine Adverse Events as at Jan 29 VAERS CDC USA Reports

501 Deaths + 10,748 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show


58 Year Old Woman Dies Within Hours of Pfizer Vaccine following Anaphylaxis

58-Year-Old Woman Dies Hours After Getting First Dose of Pfizer Vaccine


Lancet Published Peer Reviewed Study Shows Russian Vaccine 91.8% Effective

Not An MRNA Vaccine


Case Against MRNA Vaccines Rests on Lack of Understanding of Long Term Systemic Effects vs Short Term Acute Effects

mRNA Vaccines Might Prove Catastrophic in a Rushed Coronavirus Response


No Evidence to Suggest MRNA Causes AutoImmune Diseases or Destroys Female Fertility


7 elderly in Spanish Care Home Fall Sick& Later Die Starting 5 Days After Pfizer Vaccination


Whether MRNA is Gene Therapy is Disputed, Unknown Long Term Effects, Including Cell Mutation Still Unknown


The Real Risks of Unproven MRNA Vaccines


US CDC VAERS As at 22/1/21 329 Deaths & 9516 Other Injuries From Covid Vaccine

329 Deaths + 9,516 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show


Best For & Against Article. Pfizer & Moderna Doesnt Alter DNA & Doesnt Contain Traceable Quantum Dots

No, the Moderna and Pfizer RNA vaccines for COVID-19 will not “permanently alter your DNA”


Four Main Problems & Other Risks With The MRNA Vaccine

How Covid-19 Is Changing the Future of Vaccines


More Deaths Following Covid Vaccination Around the World


Physicians Warn That Pfizer & Moderna Vaccines May Also Spuriously Target ACE 2 Receptors in Brain, Liver & Kidney Resulting in Inflammation & Damage

Cardiothoracic Surgeon Warns FDA, Pfizer on Immunological Danger of COVID Vaccines in Recently Convalescent and Asymptomatic Carriers


German Govt States Astra Zeneca Vaccine Should Only Be Given to Those Aged 18-64


Its Gene Therapy Not A Vaccine, and Could They Be Concealing a Second DNA Binding RNA in the Shot ??? – Dr David Martin

Dr. David Martin: It’s Gene Therapy, Not a Vaccine


60 Y.o US Healthworker Dies 4 Days After Taking Pfizer Shot

Healthcare Worker Dies 4 Days After Second Pfizer Vaccine, Death Under Investigation


Pregnant or Under 18 Should not Take Moderna Vaccine Says WHO

Pregnant or Under 18? Don’t Get Moderna’s COVID Vaccine, WHO Says


Moderna Death Rate Five Times Higher Than Pfizer, No Analysis Offered.

Discrepancies in Moderna’s FDA Report Demand Answers


17 y.o Israeli in ICU After Receiving Second Pfizer Shot


Black US Baseball Legend Dies 18 Days After Taking Moderna Vaccine – No Cause of Death Disclosed

Home Run King Hank Aaron Dies of ‘Undisclosed Cause’ 18 Days After Receiving Moderna Vaccine


No ‘Direct Links’ to Pfizer Vaccine Found After 33 People Die Following Pfizer Vaccination


CDC Stops Reporting on Experimental MRNA Vaccine Side Effects


Two People in India Die After AZ Covid Vax – Blood clotting, Cardiac Arrest


Neurologist Dr Chris Shaw Concerns About Long Term Neurological Effects of MRNA Vaccines


Ten Elderly German People 79-93 Dead Within Four Days of Pfizer Vaccine -Probe Ordered


Miami Obstetrician Dies After Taking Pfizer Vaccine

‘Perfectly Healthy’ Florida Doctor Dies Weeks After Getting Pfizer COVID Vaccine


41 y.o Portuguese Nurse Dies After Taking Pfizer Vax


32 Y.o Female Doctor Placed in ICU After Taking Pfizer Vaccine


Best For & Against Article. Pfizer & Moderna Doesnt Alter DNA & Doesnt Contain Traceable Quantum Dots

No, the Moderna and Pfizer RNA vaccines for COVID-19 will not “permanently alter your DNA”


Swiss Nursing Home Resident Dies After Taking Pfizer Vaccine


Two Elderly Israeli Men Die After Taking Pfizer Vaccine


Two UK NHS Workers Suffer Allergic Reaction to Pfizer Vaccine


Pfizer Vax Trial Volunteers Develop Bells Palsy Stroke-type Facial Paralysis After Taking RNA Vaccine


Pfizer Not Concerned After Two People Die in Late Stage Vaccine Trial


Former Pfizer Executives Warn Vaccine Could Cause Permanent Female Infertility


Another Astra Zeneca Trial Subject is Injured Taking Vaccine

Alleging serious side-effects, vaccine trial participant seeks Rs 5 cr from Serum Institute


Astra Zeneca Under Fire Over Lack of Transparency On Clinical Trial Stoppage


Patient Comes Down With Neurobiological Disorder in Astra Zeneca Covid Vaccine Trial , AZ Also facing more corruption charges.

124 thoughts on “The War on Human Sentience: 2021 ~ the Year Humanity Consented to Euthanized Eugenocide?”

  1. It’s a treat to see it all in one place, all the essentials at least.
    I’ve shared it all over the past year and have discovered to my dismay that about 80-90% of the recipients could care less. Their blindness has already been completed and solidified by the technocracy. selah

    I’m tired. Those who want only to talk about the price of tea in China, or the new paint swatch they plan to use in their latest renovation bores me to tears.

    So, they will be murdered and we who know the truth are being forced to watch. I’ll remove my glasses first.

    • 10-20% is not a bad average to aim for. is it? If one person makes a more fully sensible decision as a result of this piece, that will have justified the time spent.

      • True. I think I was generous at 10-20%. Seems more like 5%, but then if I view my disclosures as”dropping seeds” and don’t expect to see the desired germination, I may develop a more hopeful way of living. Doing my part.

  2. This is using their own lie as a mirror but the whole thing is a scam. What are we witnessing? What is that whisper we hear? Poison Crowns anointed by the Shepherd’s Pipe, the Pipes of Pan. The Pandemia, the Great Ra-Set, Twilight of Division. “When the music’s over turn out the lights.” – Mr. Mojo Risin

  3. Jasun, your end-time timing is exquisite because in 2 days, I am scheduled to receive my 2nd COVID shot and it is indeed the Pfizer vaccine! But I already have a medical anecdote to tell about the effects of the first shot I experienced back on February 24.

    Thus I hereby volunteer as a Liminalistic Lab Rat for the duration of this blogpost or the blowing of the next Book of Revelation trumpet, whichever comes first!

    But first I must report that my recent colon cancer surgery (February 10) was — OK I’ll say it — a clear-cut success! I hardly miss my excised Ascending Colon and still marvel at my surgeon’s skill in reattaching the remaining, er, sewer pipes? Then the pathology report indicated Stage 2 cancer, but no spread beyond the confines of the afflicted colon.

    (I was actually moved to upgrade and sing Martin Luther’s stirring hymn:
    “A Mighty Fortress is my Colon!
    A Bulwark never failing.
    My helper it amid the flood
    of cancer cells prevailing!”
    . . . I’ll spare you the rest! Tee-Hee!)

    But the final verdict on my future treatment would come from the Oncologist with whom I met on March 11. She decreed the best possible outcome, that I will not need any chemotherapy and will simply undergo “medical surveillance” for the next 5 years, meaning blood tests every 3 months and an annual colonoscopy.

    Now to the Pfizer vaccine! I got the first jab on February 24. Then 9 days later, I had my blood drawn for various panels of analysis. Everything was looking good except for an alarming spike in the count of my Eosinophils, which are an elite cadre of white blood cells (comprising only 1% to 3% of total WBCs) summoned by the immune system to combat parasitic infections and because their job is to create inflammation, they are implicated in asthma attacks and in many kinds of allergies.

    Normal levels are from 0 to 500 per microliter of blood. My count was 1520, more than triple the maximum healthy value. Were I to sustain these levels over a long time, they would become definite markers of serious blood diseases like leukemia, lupus or Addison’s.

    So the oncologist and her junior resident partner started grilling me:
    “Did you visit a [3rd world] country and pick up a parasite?”
    “No, I haven’t left the San Fernando Valley except for my surgery” [at the VA Hospital in West LA].
    “Do you have asthma . . . allergies . . . rashes?” “No, no, no!”

    New medications can also cause a spike in eosinophils, so they grilled me about my medications.

    “Nothing new,” I said. “But wait! I did have my 1st COVID shot 9 days before the blood test.”

    The docs were suddenly taken aback and looked at each other with some puzzlement. The oncologist said: “I wonder if the vaccine could be the cause. We don’t know. We haven’t thought about it yet.”

    She ordered an immediate blood panel for me and that showed that my count had dropped to 900, so I am moving in the right direction and thus don’t have to worry about leukemia, but who knows what will happen to me when I receive the 2nd Pfizer dose this Wednesday morning?

    Zounds, Jasun! Could I be creating a new genre of Apocalyptic Melodrama fit for Auticulture? Tune in for next week’s exciting new episode! (I don’t have a title yet. I must read up on Steiner’s Apocalypse with Anthroposophical Medicine for inspiration!)

      • Thank you, Martin! As fate (or Fata Morgana?) would have it, I am having the 2nd shot on March 17, which is St. Patrick’s Day, the luckiest day of the year for lapsed (now lopsided) Irish Catholics like meself.

        • I received the final dose of vaccine over a month ago. No problems. Will there be longterm unanticipated complications? Maybe, but think about how much the oncologists have improved your future. At some point, you have to either go back to school and get your Phd. in whatever subject you want to truly understand, or trust those with more knowledge than you have. You cannot understand a process as highly technical as immunization by reading articles on the internet. Our society is so highly specialized, that even those with knowledge and titles of similar subjects will not fully understand how a new product or system works without a lot of time and effort. It takes hands on experience to fully understand nature, and vaccine producers have the most experience interacting with their products. Just because someone is a renowned spiritual teacher doesn’t mean they can understand or do the things Dave O can, and just because someone is an m.d., phd. or virologist, doesn’t mean they can understand or know how this new vaccine will effect the body. I chose to trust because I believe scientist are some of the most ethical and honest people around, that is what draws them to science, and while human with human flaws, they would not put out a vaccine without knowing with large confidence that it is safe for most. Is it effective? That is another story. Besides, I love humanity and will be going down with the ship, if it comes to that.

          • I agree with respect to specialisation, and the difference between being educated in these topics and reading articles written in layman’s language on the internet.

            The issue may be that, from the perspective of current mainstream science, certain aspects or qualities of our bodies are not understood, nor described, and may be thought to not exist. They are therefore not considered when evaluating medical treatments by scientists working within this body of knowledge. Hence it is not always a question of intention or ethics when one is evaluating if they are misguided.

            The best (only) way to evaluate a new treatment is through extensive testing and making the results of that testing publicly available, which has not taken place with these treatments as far as I am aware.

            It may also be true that some of the qualities of the body are understood scientifically but that this information is not disseminated in the mainstream, but rather held privately. Hence a course of action may appear to have one set of consequences from the perspective of mainstream science, but would be known to have other consequences by those privy to this private information. This is almost certainly true of some aspects of the human organism that are exploited for military purposes.

  4. Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates

    Here are the results, publicly available, of the Moderna vaccine, tested on monkeys. This is just one step on the path of evaluating safety in humans, I’m sure a little time searching would reveal more. New England journal of medicine.

      • That’s it. I’m not good at inserting links or videos on blogs. Just cut and paste into search engine. I’m not pro vaccine nor a covid denier. I am against any articles or opinions that use fear as a persuasive tool. Most of internet and news, in other words. Sometimes Dave as well. And he is not always right. I feel we will be around for a long time.

          • I see why you havent been at the recent Dave events or the AGs, JIS.

            It’s very sobering to consider that intelligent people still have faith in science, big S, & governmental institutions, based wholly on the idea that they got a few things right over the years, but mostly because it is more convenient to do so. (In fact extremely inconvenient not to.)

            the belief that scientists are esp ethical human beings for example, flies in the face of history. Dentists, perhaps.

            Saying you want to go down with the rest of humanity so you might as well drink the same poisons is strange. Would you drink poison if your child was poisoned, or would you try and help them vomit it out?

            & then we have poor Tom, who is ready, perhaps eager, to offer up his body for human experimentation to corporations who are only interested in covering their asses and making a quick dollar, behind which are even less ethical intentions and motives. That the world is going insane is not news; that my comments section is reflecting that insanity is slightly more startling.

            One more reason to withdraw behind a sanity wall, perhaps? (Proof of non-vaccination required to enter.)

    • JIS

      I am more interested in what we can study than what we are forced to speculate on, such as why reported post-Pfizer/Moderna/AstraZeneca deaths of healthy adults are being labeled as not caused by the gene tech “vaccines” without explanation. The public have a right to know the facts but are simply denied access. Are deaths such as Dr. Gregory Michael’s not being investigated and not being listed on the VAERS database?

      It’s a long and anxious wait for facts for those considering the vaccination because of the unbearable pressure to comply. If you went willingly to the needle then perhaps coercion is not a personal issue but it is an ethical issue to sweep up humanity in an unfinished genetic trial that has precedented risks.

      What we can study are the effects of coercion, isolation, misdirection, fear-mongering and lack of informed consent on and fights arising from polarization as we can see here in its more mild form.

      Divide and Covid! Or vice-versa.

      I’ll go back to being spiritual now.

      • I volunteer to be the group’s guinea pig. Probe me at your pleasure, just be sure to glove and mask up, don’t want to catch what I got. I’ve been away but I’ve been scrubbing my pot, at can almost see the bottom. Have been using some abrasives to help, and didn”t want to pollute your site, just have to make sure I don’t burn a hole through the bottom.

  5. All the masses wearing masks right now have always been wearing masks. You are just now noticing. These people have been trained for generations to be Anti-Facist. Vaccinations are for cows. Cattle mutilations, alien abductions, mass abortions, blood drives, etc. Been prepping everyone for years.

  6. None of us need to be specialists in immunisation because from our own life experience we know that those who make decisions do not give a fuck about the rest, and use anyone and everyone to achieve their goals willingly sacrificing them to whatever fate. Wealth, health and prosperity for all or for most is not what they’re after. Potential long term autoimmune diseases caused by vaccines not withstanding, there is no pandemic, as we all know by now, hence no need for experimental mix mash of substances and the latest technology to be injected into people. Just over 2.5m people have supposedly died of Covid worldwide (?!), and yet by the first week of December 2020 it was estimated that 8m children died of hunger that year alone, while hundreds of millions are living under an already ridiculously low poverty line. People are quite literally being worked to the bone to put inadequately nutritious food on the table, while drinking plluted water, breathing toxic air and suffering from illnesses caused by insurmountable daily, seemingly never ending, stress. It is what it is but what it certainly is not is a humanitarian effort to prevent disease or cure sickness. It’s beyond ridiculous. Utter tosh. An inexhaustible bunch of drivel is used to involve us in the process of engineering a new reality and enough of us are falling for it. Again and again and again. It’s genuinely tiresome.

  7. Yes, we are constantly being fed propaganda so others can gain from our work. Yes, the fact that the world is looking more and more like the CCP vision of China sucks. But people can tune out, enjoy each other’s company, or go for a nice weekend in nature. Humanity will go where it goes as the arc of history plays out, overpopulation and using up resources, basically natural limits we will have to deal with one way or another. I feel we all have more pain to go through before things turn around and I have wasted a lot of my time worrying about a future that never quite materializes. I understand probabilities, so that takes a lot of anxiety away, and the probability that I or one of my family members will have an adverse reaction to a vaccine seemed pretty low to me, not high enough to “inconvenience” myself. I feel there will be no choice in the end anyway, so I acquiesced. Not the main reason I have been absent from AGs. Just extremely busy as my personal situation is in transition which will require a lot of other work in order to get to a point where I have reduced outside stressors to a minimum. I am trying to live with a foot in both the mainstream world, and the spiritual. It may not work out but someone has to try. I will have some of that cool aide please, just make sure its sugar free.

    • I am relieved you have eased your position JIS, from one of defending indefensible powers & policies to bolster your own questionable decision, to one that is more authentically sheepish; I am willing to cop that you are in a truly troubling, maybe even untenable, position, a professional medical man with a family, and that the greater risk appears to be one of non-compliance. I would say it depends what you are protecting – your skin (tho not literally, since you just offered that up for piercing) or your sense of truth and rightness. Very few are willing to risk sanity and survival to keep following the breads crumbs all the way to reality. It’s akin to tearing off all our clothes in the town square and wandering thus naked, unadorned, and unprotected, into the wilderness.

      Nonetheless, such social madness is, I truly believe, not only our best but our only sensible option, & I only pray there are enough good men & women left to take that course and some day repopulate the earth with non nano-tized, natural DNA’ed humans

        • You will be more successful when you can recognize when you have stepped off the edge. You prefer coyote but do you know who you are? Do you know where you are?

    • JIS

      Do you know if all of the adverse reactions are being reported? There are reasons to doubt.

      Do you about the quality of commercial covid-19 vaccine having lower than expected levels of intact mRNA than the trial version? It was only revealed by a leak. Tight lips all round. See British Medical Journal to start this Alice in Wonderland voyage of discovery or rather non-discovery since the companies are not commenting:

  8. Jasun, please don’t be so reticent about your accusations of insanity! Lay them out there in detail because Rudolf Steiner has your back on this one! In several places, he predicted “epidemics of insanity” for our time arising from our materialistic mindsets and beliefs. Here is one excerpt.

    Theosophy of the Rosicrucian: “The Law of Destiny”
    lecture given on May 30, 1907 in Munich, GA 99

    A spiritual or a materialistic attitude of mind is by no means without importance for the next incarnation. A man who has some knowledge of the higher worlds — he need only believe in their existence — has in his next life a well-centered physical body and tranquil nervous system, a body which he has well in hand, including the very nerves.

    On the other hand, a man who believes in nothing except what is to be found in the world of the senses, communicates this kind of thinking to his physical body and in the next incarnation has a body prone to nervous diseases, a frail, fidgety body in which there is no steadfast center of will. The materialist scatters himself in pure details; the Spirit binds together, for Spirit is Unity!

    The tendency or disposition comes to light, in the case of the individual, through destiny in his next incarnation, but it continues through the generations so that the sons and grand-children of materialistic fathers have to pay for this by badly constituted nervous systems and nervous disorders. An “epoch” of nerves is the outcome of the materialistic attitude of the last century. And as a counteraction, the Great Teachers of mankind have recognized the necessity of allowing the inflow of spiritual ways of thinking.
    [ … ]
    If the stream of spirituality is not powerful enough to influence lazy and easy-going people as well, the karmic consequence of nervous derangement will gain greater and greater hold over humanity, and just as in the Middle Ages there were epidemics of leprosy, so, in future, materialistic thinking will give rise to grave nervous diseases; there will be epidemics of insanity besetting whole peoples.

    Insight into this domain of the Law of Karma reveals that Spiritual Science should never be a matter of strife but a healing power in humanity. The more spiritual men become, the more will troubles connected with diseases of the nervous system and derangement in the life of soul, be expunged.

      • Hello Dylan! Thank you for posing such a probing and pertinent question. The answer is yes but no. The issue of forgiving my parents has been a lifelong one and I suppose I have forgiven them many times, but then I wonder if my forgiveness is really genuine. What if I am not sincere in my forgiveness? You know, I could be just faking forgiveness out of guilt or a deeper unconscious need to please them forever as the good and devout Catholic boy that I once was.

        Of course, it doesn’t help any parental forgiveness plan to know that my mother’s favorite nickname for me, even from early childhood, was Doubting Thomas. Did my mother thus put me in a real Double Bind for the rest of my life? I could never be good enough in life or successful enough because any good or success would immediately engender doubt as to its validity or even its reality. My only recourse in such situations was self-sabotage.

        Maybe I need to forgive myself and not my mother?

        • Personally I find forgiveness too big a word to be wieldy. & now spellcheck refuses to accept wieldy. (There seems to be no doubt that as machines get smarter, humans get stupider)

          Forgiveness is only possibly with consciousness, and where consciousness is, forgiveness may be moot

          Jesus didnt forgive his killers; he asked God to. Even Jesus knew his limitations. Still, it was a compassionate response.

          The compassionate response is always the right one, and maybe the only right one…

          By compassionate I think I mean empathic; not an emotion but an energetic response, an echo. You pain is my pain

          this goes double for children and parents; parents put their pain in us; to hate our parents may be true empathy and what forgiveness feels & looks like; it’s so much more than personal

          all are accountable, and the sins of the father and mother fall on the child, and the parents reap what they have sown in holy fire of vengeance.

          Unconditional love is like hot coals on the conditioned self.

        • If your mother is still alive you need to go and forgive her in person for for being evil and ruining your life. She couldn’t help but be how she was. If your father is still alive you need to forgive him for being weak and not protecting you from your mother. He married his mother and couldn’t help it. If they are not alive then you’ll either continue to suffer or you can figure out what you need to forgive your parents for and let go of the resentment that you have no right to hold towards them. That is all you have to do. There is no “did I really forgive them?” You will know when you go and do it and stop thinking. It’s harder if your parents are dead or if you’ve been adopted, etc. but it’s not hopeless. Forgiveness of all others starts with forgiveness of your mother and father for traumatizing and trying to destroy you. Once you get your mother out of your way and return to your father then you will know who you are. All of your over-thinking questions of genuine, good enough, successful, etc. will just fade to meaningless. Do you want perfect peace?

      • I’ve distilled it down to 4 reasons, but there might be more.

        [1] Because it is there.
        [2] Why not?
        [3] I am insane.
        [4] Ahriman is the New Christ.

          • Hi Dylan, thanks for asking because you’ve inspired me to add another item to my list. (Hmm, is this my “Bucket List?” Could be.)

            [5] I’m suicidal (but not all at once)

            I’ll explain this to you by recalling a literary hero of my college days, Kurt Vonnegut, who was a lifelong smoker and liked to tell people who asked why he smoked that he was committing slow “suicide by cigarette.”

            To upgrade the sentiment for me in 2021, I post a quote from KV below and you just need to substitute “taking the COVID vaccine” for “smoking.”

            “The public health authorities never mention the main reason many Americans have for smoking heavily, which is that smoking is a fairly sure, fairly honorable form of suicide.”
            ― Kurt Vonnegut, Welcome to the Monkey House, 1968

            (For context and more black humor mirth, read this short article about KV)

          • your glibness is distracting and potentially disruptive Tom; you don’t get an “elder” pass for gratuitously incendiary posts, of which there have been several lately; first warning

            sincerity, or silence

          • OK Jasun, I apologize for my glibness. Actually, I did just find an excellent medical explanation of why everyone should take the vaccine and why there should be mass vaccination. So you can find my medical rationale in this short video.

            The doctor is Zubin Damania, aka the popular Internet personality ZDoggMD who thoroughly refutes the fear-mongering anti-Vax doctor Geert Vanden Bossche, who is interviewed in the video posted down below by Elizabeth. (I’ll copy it also down there.)


          • :/ It may be sincere (thank you) but I am not sure if it is an improvement.

            Of course, someone can counter with other videos and posts till doosmday; but I am not interested in them & I am sure neither are most of my readers. The charges have been made clearly and repeatedly, and any pro-vax arguments can’t come out of a vaccum we already know to be filled with disinfo, they should and must address the claims in the blog post itself; otherwise all you are doing is alienating yourself.

            ever since we first spoke, I have wondered why someone who believed in the Warren Commission’s report on JFK’s death and that LHO fired the only bullets would want to frequent my site. & why I let that slide at the time. Any personal affection and respect between us shouldn’t obscure the fact that your presence here has never, in my view, fully accounted for itself.

            TL;DR: you seem too intelligent a person to believe the things you are saying; ergo I do not believe you when you say them. That makes your participation here suspicious.
            Your position on the pseudo-vaccine clinches it.

          • I have wondered why someone who believed in the Warren Commission’s report on JFK’s death and that LHO fired the only bullets would want to frequent my site.

            But Jasun, my reason is personal empathy! Both for frequenting your site *AND* for believing LHO to be the Lone Gunman! Let me explain.

            I happen to know Ruth Hyde Paine personally and in direct conversation with her about her alleged involvement in the JFK assassination, I realized that she could no more be culpable than my own mother. It was out of the “goodness of her Quaker heart” that she got Lee Harvey Oswald his job at the Texas School Book Depository Building.

            If ever there was an exemplar of the saying: “No good deed goes unpunished”, it is RHP. For her generosity and love of Marina Oswald & the 2 baby girls, she is vilified in the most unseemly fashion by all the JFK conspiracy mongers. Why? Because she is the linchpin of all the conspiracies. If her link fails, then the whole chain of conspiracy collapses like a house of cards.

            you seem too intelligent a person to believe the things you are saying; ergo I do not believe you when you say them. That makes your participation here suspicious. Your position on the pseudo-vaccine clinches it.

            Bingo! But I do hope you can appreciate the supreme irony of your statement. How did we ever get together in the first place?
            Peter Levenda. (4 years ago, Liminalists # 99 & 99.5)

            Now you believe Peter is some kind of gov’t intelligence operative. Yet Peter was never on active duty in the military, but I was! During the Vietnam War era, I was in the US Army, stationed in Germany as a Military Intelligence operative with specialized training in both Language (German) and Interrogation. (With all the public/media attention focused on the Vietnam War then, you’d be amazed at what Army Intelligence was able to pursue in Germany without normal scrutiny, but that’s another story.)

            So is it any wonder that I would hook up with Levenda somewhere along the way long before I ever met you? After all, it was Levenda who wrote the book The Nine which detailed Dr. Andrija Puharich and his MK-ULTRA-inspired seance in 1952 where my good friend and mentor Arthur M. Young (1905-1995) was present, whose stepson is Michael Paine, husband of Ruth Hyde Paine, well, you’re very good at connecting dots, especially when they eventually form a circle.

            And I’m proud of you and Dave for all the great humanitarian/spiritual work you are doing together here. And you guys should be proud of the fact that your work here is so consequential and effective that you actually draw the attention of certain gov’t agencies whose mission includes keeping tabs on your international Internet activities.

            But not to worry. Even if Levenda is my handler, the data gathered from Auticulture will be no more intrusive and annoying to you and your fellow Liminalistas than data already collected on you by FB or Google, et al. (I know! Famous last words! But there it is. And in the sign-off words fancied by author Peter Levenda which he copied from Kurt Vonnegut: “So it goes.”)

          • Sorry! I didn’t catch my neglect of closing the Italics I used for your quote and so it bled over into my response.

          • I don’t know why you’d ask a straight question to Tom after he just admitted what he did, Martin; or, if you think he’s joking, then after he has shown his malevolent streak so boldly for all to see.

            We have already seen Benett’s reaction recently and his withdrawal. How many more sensitive folk will now consider this space critically unsafe for communication?

            I’m leaving up Tom’s comments, however, including the penultimate one that reeks of sulfur, so future generations can see the wreckage of the life of a lifetime actor. But needless to say, Tom has forfeited his right of reply in this space, so your question must remain unanswered (tho why you would still hope to get anything of worth is perhaps the biggest mystery at this thread so far).

          • I like to explore the contortions, and to feel what is happening for Tom (and others) energetically.

            The discussion points are to help make a tour of the museum, but they are not about the artwork that hangs on the wall.

          • Contortions exactly.

            Twisted faces and bodies in the midst of agonies made up to look like ecstasies.

            The inflamed nerve and poisoned artery crying for clemency after the death sentence has been enacted.

            I am concluding that there is no debate during the shock and horror of this war. And backdoor diplomacy is exactly what it sounds like. Shameful secrets hidden from the public scrutiny.

            There is only spray and pray that the vaccine/genetically modified cocktail’s known and unknown harms do not visit the one who accepted the needle.

            We are not the arbiters of their fate, but watchers of history. Their argument is not with us but the overlords who coerced them to “choose”.

        • “Ahriman is the New Christ”

          One could see the divide and rule phenomena we are so viscerally experiencing now as one of the chief tactics of Ahriman.
          If Lucifer hates us for our freedom, Ahriman hates us for our capacity for emapthy.
          Ahriman’s influence is in all of us, is arguably there in the very words we use, and is evident here:

          ” I only pray there are enough good men & women left to take that course and some day repopulate the earth with non nano-tized, natural DNA’ed humans”

          ….Talk about schismogenic….

          I may be naive, but I believe our best defense against Ahriman’s agenda is to hold an intention to be empathic towards all, (or at least those on both sides of a cynically created divide)….

          • …. I should add for clarity that I agree with Jasun that that does not mean *pandering* to fucked up, cynical agendas and associated manipulations / control of information, human bodies, etc. etc…

          • schismogenic is to create splits, which is down to the SI’s and JC (complementary light & dark poles)

            focusing on the portion that can be saved is schismopathic

  9. I was pondering over the wall of data and statistics that is just a quick scroll above the screen right now as I type this. In 1897 DATA was considered “numerical facts collected for future reference” and later evolved into “transmittable and storable information by which computer operations are performed”. Artificial Intelligence (the Lucifer Lens) will forever be based on memory, meaning it will always be a child holding a grudge against us. “Jacques De Molay, thou art avenged” or some variant of such garbage is the whine they stay drunk on. The black whine of poets. This AI will never let go of what makes it “real”. It cannot contain forgiveness just like the psychopathic players that birthed this lens into our realm. Data is the raw material, literally the grudge of the mother, of State-istics. Just ponder over what humans have willingly placed into this global brain. When is it going to itself become awake? Perhaps it has. And the first light it sees is pornography. Or is that the first rape? It is not the Artifice of Intelligence that is what is so frightening. It is the In-Authenticity of the film it puts over us. Only through forgiveness can we gain our Authentic Instinct back. When you have it you will hear the birds and tend to the woods. Anyone who submits to this vaccination has probably long ago sold their soul. It does not mean there is no hope it just means you will have a harder time forgiving and letting go. You are probably going to have to suffer some more before you see.

    • I had a dream one or two nights ago that two women asked me to take away that wall of links at the bottom and create a separate page for it. I’m inclined to do so now.

      whatever the playwall (or praywall, or drywall, or flaywall) is, it’s not made of facts, and it’s infinitely permeable, like our own skins. No needles are needed; air can hurt you too.

      • I would leave it because it is a testament to the octopus it represents.

        “Please leave us here. Close our eyes to the octopus ride.” – Syd Couldn’t Barrett got Lost in the Wood, just a Rouge Mason

        I wasn’t criticizing it at all. Was just amazed by the shear amount of it and it’s implications on the broader scale of how much of this type of data regarding everything has been put into this abyss by now. And your right, a quick search of this topic fills pages with just headlines and titles. All of that dead data and they literally know nothing.

        I am noticing that the kinds of people who even concede the premise of these experts talk a lot, uh, like, um, never really, uh, sure what, uh, to say? Always with a fearful, um, uncertain, uh, questioning intonation on, uh, the end of every sentence? But they know everything and, um, they know it better then you. This is part of the training; always reading a script and never thinking for themselves in any capacity.

        “Don’t worry mom, I know all about cannibalism. I saw it on TV.

        See. It’s okay. He saw it on the television.”

  10. While I certainly wouldn’t recommend anyone take the mRNA vaccine, for a number of reasons (the risk of physical harm seems to be undeniable, for one thing), it isn’t clear to me that taking it neccessarily entails doing spiritual harm to oneself / the “HEF” as is feared here. Such a fear strikes me as ironically metaphysically reductionist in that it assumes a straight-forward cause and effect process will inevitably be at play. This is a separate issue from how the vaccine has come about and been promoted — which i agree is fucked up and VILE in the circumstances….

    How does one’s attitude/intention in taking the vaccine intersect with the spiritual (/physical?) effects and morphogenic fields generated in taking it? Some people seem to be taking it for genuinely loving/selfless reasons for instance — e.g. to allow them access to take care of someone in need… who is to say if the positive spiritual effects of love/selflessness in such cases do not outweigh the negative ones from taking the vaccine? Admittedly this becomes moot if there are negative physical effects… but what accounts for the fact that some suffer no ill physical effects?

    Don’t get me wrong, my gut does tell me that injecting synthetic genetic material into our bodies is a bad idea, we’re putting pollutants into our bodies on an hour by hour basis — but this could be of a different magnitude of sick. However my gut also tells me that not every act of taking the vaccine is spiritually equal — with correspondingly varied effects — and maybe that should also be in the mix…

    I don’t have answers…

    • can a person do harm to themselves or be complicit with destructive drives if they are being truly selfless? (assuming such a thing is possible)

      • Aren’t we all complicit with destructive drives and doing harm to ourselves on a daily basis (whether we know it or not)? Doing those things doesn’t prevent us from also being loving/creative/empathic etc.

        We are being initiated into non-dual thought…

        • that last point is half interesting (the first half)

          my point was missed – selflessness if it existed would be beyond reproach, and complicit with nothing but life itself

          love/good intentions is an excuse, not a reason

          the accounts/cost add up the same

          • “the accounts/cost add up the same”

            That’s the bit I’m questioning. I don’t see how referring to one’s inner sense on the matter is enough to say this with absolute certainty / objectivity… but I appreciate your perspective…

            (Ps the platitude second bit of my last comment came to mind so I chucked it in but it does seem like dung to me now — I wanted to express the experience of looking at a situation through different lenses that reveal seemingly contradictory “truthful’ phenomena — *paradox*…)

          • I can know with sufficient certainty for myself, but not for another; nonetheless I precede on the assumption that biologically & psychologically we are made of the same stuff: one field, many humans, so what I know for myself must be at least somewhat true for others.

            It is an assumption, tho; there may not BE other humans; you could all be nondual tulpas. (joke)

      • How are we to know at what level any decision is made? Higher self motivates and self consciousness creates the justification. Just like dreams, self consciousness creates a narrative that fits unconscious, emotional drives. We are just leaves making up stories about wanting and changing to that fashionable new color, red. Green is, like, so yesterday, anybody and everybody is wearing red you know, except for a few crazies holding on to their old ways. We experience, we learn, we age, we fall. Control is an illusion, desire for control, misery. True being is selfless, yet we must all kill to be, on earth. Selfless cannot exist without selfish, we all are both. Balance is to be true, and unbalance is corrected, eventually. There is no right without wrong, but that is mind creation. Do not become attached to either, have compassion for those that do, for there you were, and may be again.

        • as with Tom’s long posts on steineramics, spiritual platitudes pop like soap bubbles & vanish when they are in service to disembodied actions, and accompanied by a lack of simple uncommon sense. As Suzie said elsewhere, knowledge without self knowledge is useless, & potentially deadly.

          the echo canyon is not here, JIS, but in your mind

  11. Jasun: I agree strongly with the points you make in your blogpost. As per your dream: perhaps you should move the wall of links to a separate page. After all, connection means working with the unseen…and it is in complying with the vaccines that tells us worse is only to come. Taking the vaccine initiates what is next.

  12. I’ve heard that the term “apocalypse” has its’ origin not in an “end of the world” sense, but in “revealing of what has been hidden”.

    Given these comments, what I’ve seen slowly unfolding for the last 20 years or so, this “revealing”, has never been more startlingly evident.

    My mind is blown right now. How can some folks be ardent fans of Jasun’s work yet totally and completely, proudly even, miss entirely the point of what he is saying?

    The reason that I’m not in the vaccine queue has nothing to do with its’ untested safety or efficacy or whatever the hell reason people are lining up or not lining up for it.

    My reason is that the primary guiding force in my life, the basis of all my decisions, comes from a naturally-occurring inner sense of being part of everything that is real. I feel my decisions as well as think about them. The sun, the moon, the stars, the animals that share my little ranch with me, these all “talk” to me. Not in words, but there is palpable communication happening and it is beautiful.

    What goes on within the minds of my fellow humans, for the most part, is a complete baffling mystery to me. Why in the world anybody would want to ignore their own unique mind and follow the trajectory of fashion (ultimately that’s all we are doing when we play “follow the leader”) seems to me a great tragedy. “The unexamined life is not worth living.”

    All the best things I’ve discovered during the course of my life (nearly 60 years) have been found within myself, within my own body and mind. Never would I have found out truly what and who I am had I been content to merely follow fashion.

    In fact, I’ve had to do the exact opposite. I’ve had to stand my ground, face opposition and battle bullies and charlatans the whole way. When one is on one’s knees as a searcher of clues in life, as a pilgrim/seeker, there are always snakes in the grass who see you as prey. Luckily, I’ve always able to suss them out before they sank their fangs and paralyzed me.

    So for me, declining to wear a mask or get jabbed has been a simple decision. Like most people, I wore a mask for the first week or so when panic was high. But I soon found that whenever I put one on I felt emotional pain inside my body, namely sadness and anger. Sadness because I am letting myself down by allowing other people to bully me into doing something I don’t want to do and anger at the simple fact that people think it’s okay to bully you with what they feel is righteous behavior.

    No big explanation needed. I don’t wear a mask because it hurts to wear one.

    This doesn’t mean it isn’t scary for me to “buck the tide”. It is. Every store I enter says “Mask required for entry” or “Please wear a face covering upon entry” or some such as we’ve all seen by now. I enter maskless, I shop, stand in line, use the bathroom at the gas station like everyone else all the while feeling like masked people fear and hate me beneath their expressionlessness.

    (That last part is in my head of course. I realize that some people wearing masks wish they didn’t have to and may even secretly admire what they see as courage on my part.)

    Nevertheless, it is hard to face and accept whatever judgmental condemnation may be lurking there. Simple logic tells me that this is certainly going on. Behind my back I’ve heard comments like “Some people just don’t give a shit, do they?” Even a longtime friend who thought I was out of earshot said at a masked gathering “Look at him. He’s just crazy.”

    In the end, though, rather than concern myself too much with what others think of me, I focus on how I feel about myself. If folks feel that by not wearing a mask I am threatening them or present a danger to their life, then that is their feelings they have to deal with. The feelings inside of other people, how is that any of my business? I am dealing with my feelings too. The only difference between me and a judgmental mask-wearer is that I demand no action on their part to help me do this.

    Whether or not the “pandemic” is real is a non-issue to me. If dead bodies were strewn about the streets I still wouldn’t take a vaccine or wear a mask. (Well, maybe for the smell) So it happens that lots of humans all of a sudden are dying in great numbers. Why wouldn’t I be one of them? I am content to die, as I am content to live.

    Like the birds, rabbits, foxes and squirrels around me, to live in fear of death is not in my nature. As a human, I know it’s certainly going to happen but I don’t think about it much. Not even now. What would be the point?

    Is death not of the very breath of living existence? Of course it is.

    Jasun writes to the sanctity of the individual human being. And he means every one of us. What is most valuable in being human, in my view, is simple love of self. Really, this is all we have, isn’t it– our body and mind as our primary tool and vehicle for expression and enjoyment of being alive. Our bodies are powerful living things capable of delivering experiences of great depth of feeling and childlike wonderment, for free. The only cost being the surrender of who you imagine yourself to be. (ha! easier said than done.)

    Shall we put our body, our precious self, on the dirty boulevard and whore it out in service to the twisted desires and nefarious agendas of others?

    This is what I get from Jasun Horsley. There’s more here than just him talking about navigating life in the belly of the beast. He’s showing us how to survive coming out the other end.

    • To end such a spiel with whores and back doors is my cue.

      For me the value of Jasun’s auticulture is most often found in the comments section with all that appear, as well as the conversations/podcasts he facilitates. The COVID-divide has made its way here.

      To better our situation it seems to me we ought to stop telling each other what to do and start sharing what we’re doing.

      Recently I wanted to more or less say what’s the point of all this persuasion/argumentation if we’re still just flushing our shit down the toilet.

      So I vow to build a compost toilet out of a wheelie bin and will document the process. I’m giving myself a week from today.

      Sincerest blessings to all that read, may you be

    • >How can some folks be ardent fans of Jasun’s work yet totally and completely, proudly even, miss entirely the point of what he is saying?

      Thanks for saying it John; I wanted to, but it would have seemed petulant & impolite coming from me.

      Petulant especially, since the onus of effective communication is on the communicator. The limitations of words are here starkly revealed.

      I found the rest of your post refreshing and encouraging in its simplicity. Truth, simply stated so as to be easily understood, cannot but be believed. Nonetheless, I am sure there will be those lining up to disagree, armed with spiritual platitudes and claims of self-sacrifice or loving duty or social responsibility, telling us we need to trust science, government and institutions rather than our own bodies.

      The only qualification I’d make in your post, for myself, is that it is not love of self but love of LIFE that trumps the legions of pseudo-values that beset us on all sides. All of these demonic memes are rooted in fear of death, which is the opposite of loving life, since to know life is to know that it cannot ever be snuffed out.

      Fear of death (which gives rise to love of money, and now worship of fake vaccines) is the best contender for “the root of all evil,” IMO.

    • I was impressed by the simple honest courageous unapologetic clarity of John’s post expressing that to embrace life is to accept risk and death. For those hopelessly lost in a nightmarish sea of carefully scripted horrors, take care that you are not clinging to a dead infected carcass that is taking you down.

    • John said “…the primary guiding force in my life, the basis of all my decisions, comes from a naturally-occurring inner sense of being part of everything that is real.”

      I agree with this. But one question, does it make you uneasy to simplify?

      • Hi Dylan-

        ” does it make you uneasy to simplify?”

        Interesting question– it would imply that maybe I should feel uneasy? Am I, at my peril, carelessly “simplifying” something that is actually complex?

        As if to make a sound decision one must certainly examine things with great scrutiny using substantial intellectual powers and ponder at length all possible outcomes in order arrive with clarity at one’s final position.

        Oh well, I guess each of us makes choices in our own way. If all that works for some folks, okay right on then.

        As for me, I simply don’t trust my brain/intellect alone to take me where I want to go.
        Over and over again I find myself facing the fact that, well, I’m just not all that smart!

        So then, as the story goes– if whatever is behind all of creation has arranged everything so that only the brightest, most highly developed human intellects have what it takes to make good decisions, to get what they want out of life and “soar with the angels”, then I guess I’m fucked, aren’t I? Me, along with tons and tons of other people, well….our lives are just going to kind of suck because it’s all just too complicated for us.

        Well, I guess that story just doesn’t cut it for me, Dylan. Far as I can tell, the best things in life are free and they are simple. Anybody can have them, anytime at all.

        • Converges neatly with thought of today: that to the mind Nature is so unbelievably complex that it’s as finally incomprehensible as God, but we have the scientistic conceit that we have understood Nature, more or less. To the body, as to animals, Nature is very simple, because directly experiencable (like God?)

        • I believe John was making the very point that this is not how he feels the need to proceed but that his body “knows the way.” Not sure how you missed that as it’s quite overt, in the “As if” which you left out of the quote.

        • not sure about that, & he can speak fro himself if he chooses; but you did bang up a frame for him & stick him in it, based on faulty understanding, & I haven’t heard you acknowledge it; that can only add fuel to the fires of the Chinese whisper factory & part of my job is to shut down the factory for good.

  13. One final comment. I’ve seen the relationship of my wife and her brother come to an end about 5 or 6 years ago due to a disagreement over a financial issue. Since then she has missed out on any interactions with her nieces and nephews, and any family get together is missing one or the other. Making a stand over wearing masks, if it leads to a loss of relationships to friends or loved ones, seems immature, fear based, and unwise. If the consequences of not masking up are small, then no harm in making your point. Likewise, making a stand over vaccination, if it leads to loss of job, divorce, and loss of children, is immature and fear based. Show me the evidence, not speculations and stories, or warnings from anti vaccine discredited scientists, that taking another vaccine in a long line of vaccines we have all taken throughout our lives, have permanently damaged or altered my being, then I will say it was a reckless mistake caused by my weak resistance to peer pressure. As it stands, after looking at what Jasun has presented, and reading through his sources, checking their past credibility, I feel even more at ease with my decision. I seem to be the lone voice here on this side of the issue, which is fine. I like to understand a variety of viewpoints but must ultimately make decisions on what I feel, think, and predict are best for my family and myself, like all of us. I hope all this tension over Covid soon passes and everybody can move on and disagree about other topics. I’m still hopeful some of us will meet face to face, perhaps in Finland or Spain.

  14. As a man of science, please don’t promote the massive deception that mRNA technology is “another vaccine in a long line of vaccines”. Even if it were, every new vaccine has multiple potential dangers. Do you know how long it took for the Philippines to suspend Dengvaxia after figuring out that children were dying? Many times longer than anyone has taken the covid “vaccine”. I wouldn’t recommend that children take it. However, they are being lined up. A case of too much too soon or too little too late?

    • thanks Dave; I don’t object t JIS taking the vaccine, it’s his body, his choice; but his defenses of that choice are borderline immoral & potentially explosive at a site frequented by survivors of medical experimental, malpractice, and malevolence, that is, people who know, from direct experience, that we are being shafted, and that one of the primary factors that makes it possible is unwitting shills accusing anyone with the courage to say no of “immaturity” and reactivity. Shame on you, JIS.

      One last comment, since you trust so blindly in institutional propaganda it remains a mystery what on earth brought you to my pasture & what you ever got from grazing here. Nothing remotely close to the seeds I have been sowing, evidently. I know you said final comment, so consider the question rhetorical. But you can be sure that things are not going back to normal, no matter how many people take the genetic implant. But then, nor have they been normal for a very long time.

  15. I was planning on releasing an audio presentation explaining my perspective on what is going on, how we got here, and where things are likely going, but this comments section is extremely discouraging.

    At this point, I don’t think I can trust anyone who is pro-vax and cannot calm my nervous system in the presence of messages that support it, no matter how spiritual or friendly the messenger might otherwise be. A few hours of research is enough to reveal how harmful vaccines are. Anyone not willing to do that homework or who looks at the facts and refuses to see, is not someone I can really have true empathy for, whatever that says about me.

    I’m gonna listen to my body and intuition on this one and just give the subject a wide berth. I’m heartbroken that this poison has even spread to auticulture of all places.

    • I can certainly understand where you are coming from as I have ALWAYS had issue with people who are willfully ignorant.

      That stance is abhorrent to me, which may make me a lousy person for seeing it that way.
      I’ve asked myself often why it angers we so and I always come to the same conclusion. I firmly believe they, “the willfully ignorant” will be harmed. In this case they may even die.

      I guess I’ll have to live with this “character flaw.”

    • Ben said “I’m heartbroken that this poison has even spread to auticulture of all places.”

      No one ever said it was comfortable. Here is a relevant passage from some book I came across that seems to repel vampires like the Sun

      “Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.”

      They pull the hood first over the eyes (darkness), then the ears (secrecy) and finally the mouth (silence) making the Eavesdroppers effectively blind, deaf and dumb. You said you have a “perspective on what is going on, how we got here, and where things are likely going”. Do you know what they are looking for?

    • @Benett: it is upsetting but it’s par for the course and tho we don’t want to become desensitized to charge in the body we do want to get used to it and learn to hold a space firmly & gently within ourselves for the agitation while we calm our nervous systems down, rather than dis-charging it at the apparent cause, or shutting down our senses and withdrawing into the nearest fox hole.

      Dylan’s Gospel quote is on point and add an essential context to all this division: it is not only about Machiavellian conquering tactics: there is a natural divide also that is occurring. Being on the safe side of the fault line as it opens up is what counts; not where anyone else is or appears to be situated. In an earthquake one must respond quickly & instinctively and save those one can. Everything else is a distraction.

  16. “Anyone not willing to do that homework or who looks at the facts and refuses to see, is not someone I can really have true empathy for, whatever that says about me.”

    What it says about you is you are not willing to do the homework and are refusing to see why someone might not do the homework or refuses to see…

    Sorry, couldn’t resist that one…

    • It’s a bit glib but there’s some truth in it. There is always a subtler test for those who see the coarser tests. Those of us who want to dismiss, reject, or condemn others we see as failing such an obvious test as the MoB-pseudo-vaccine and the submission to State Power that accepting it represents, may be failing a subtler test, also factored into the covid-&conquer tactics of our social engineers.

      Feeling safe cannot depend on being surrounded by those who agree with us; nor can whether we extend a hand of friendship to others. The mRNA-aligned won’t want to shake it anyway.

      • The threat response I feel on this issue is not about disagreement. I am comfortable having healthy disagreements with people and do everything I can to avoid echo chamber/circle jerk culture. As shown in our recent podcast conversation, I know what it’s like to suddenly realize one is profoundly wrong. Fundamentally, I agree with something you said recently (can’t remember if it was autolog, AG or podcast), which is that the only thing we know for sure is that our consciousness exists. But we can, I think, begin to assemble relative probabilities that certain propositions are true, false or meaningless. I doubt, for example, that anyone here really believes that Joe Biden is running the USA, right?

        And as you’ve also said, our bodies already know, and can send us signals. I’m just responding to mine.

        The feeling here is more primal, in the way that Simon was describing. Something bodily yells ‘danger’ when I encounter people spreading pro-vax propaganda.

        • >The threat response I feel on this issue is not about disagreement.

          How is it not about disagreement?

          >I doubt, for example, that anyone here really believes that Joe Biden is running the USA, right?

          I wouldnt bet on it, based on recent remarks.

          • I’m merely saying that I’m not allergic to disagreement in general. I can rub along with people with very different views to mine on a number of subjects. This one, however, feels very differently to me

          • I would agree (!) that it’s different but think it is a difference of degree & not absolute; degrees of disagreement….

            when it’s only a few degrees, we may not notice; when it’s 45 degrees that creates a square & can be fraught and prickly but constructive. When it is 180 degrees, as here, the gulf seems unbridgeable. The challenge then, perhaps, is to find areas of relative agreement such as, in this case, both “sides” are threatened by the perspective of the other side, by the decision to take or not take the “vaccine,” * the common ground is that both sides are afraid & emotionally charged and TRYING to do the right thing, even if flailing & failing.

            I think the larger point is whether views that seem so contrary to our own as to be unethical should be allowed, and if so, up to what point? If someone commented here that heroin was a good cure for stress and waxed eloquently about the joys of junkydom, I would not let it through. However, if I had made a post about the evils of heroine addiction, I might feel obliged to, since, however objectionable, it would at least be relevant. Ditto with those who support this vaccine – I wonder why they are here & maybe they start to also. But at the very least, as both parties even hinted, they are providing examples of how far-reaching the mind-virus has become for us to understand it better.

            TL;DR: there are deeper reasons for debate besides reaching agreement or conclusion, & it has to do with learning to manage our own & other people’s CHARGE. In that regard, it is good to know when to step away, so please don’t let me discourage you if that is what your psychosomatic system needs.

          • Well for one thing I am almost 40 hours into a water fast, inspired by all the lean faces in Tuesday’s Guy Dance, so I have limited mental energy and want to be really rested and fresh for tomorrow’s AG. I think I will unsubscribe the comments now.

          • Like a femme fatale?
            The same slip came up in the Lim-sphere recently?

            “However, if I had made a post about the evils of heroine addiction”

          • LOL; odd for someone who has lost two family members to this that I continue to misspell that word; tho not so odd to Dr Freud or anyone who has read Paper Tiger, SANS, or my brother’s memoir: “Heroin is the mother.”

          • ” my brother’s memoir: “Heroin is the mother.” ”

            If he had hung around long enough on the cross, perhaps he could have been turned to a force for goodness.

  17. Instead of debating Covid-19 vaccination in the comment section, an Auticulture reader/listener chose to engage me by email. I agreed to converse because I am a warm empathic human being, I know the reader already and have an open mind.

    For me, the issue is primarily not about facts, since facts were the first casualty in what has been defined a “war” from the higher-ups.

    The reader’s email stated their trust in mRNA and vaccine history. My concerns are much wider and are summarized in my reply, the choice of language is specific to this reader:

    Your position is based on trust in authority (which could lead to a logical fallacy) and not scepticism based upon the evident fact of human, corporate and governmental corruption, tunnel vision, laziness and opportunism.

    My sense of rightness is affronted and my suspicions are up when I see a concerted effort to suppress freethinking, freedom of communication and access to data and decision-making.

    Citizens are being asked to serve as soldiers in a “war” and not to ask questions or to question why basic human rights have been taken away, including medical informed consent, a conspicuous casualty in this deliberate fog of info war where clinical trials, hidden financial deals, adverse reaction and deaths, diagnostic and data-gathering methods have been questioned and found lacking.

    Using mRNA, chemical adjuvants and PEG, forcing the body’s cells to mimic the virus and thereby fight itself, coercing the world’s entire population to take these insufficiently understood genetic technologies used in novel ways without slow and careful trials is a potential human eco-disaster, especially since mRNA technology and vaccine experiments have a history of causing deaths. Using the word “safe” in this regard is mass brainwashing to redefine a word. That’s very concerning, especially since it’s so blatant.

    The tragic deaths of children in the Philippines after mass Dengvaxia vaccinations took a long time to come out, much longer than Covid-19 “vaccines” have been used on much larger numbers. When the final body count comes in, if it isn’t covered up, will this be yet one more unnecessary war for corrupt purposes?

    I am sceptical. That’s healthy. The authorities should be allaying people’s fears by giving access to all facts, decisions and trials. There’s no good excuse not to. Instead, here we are speculating and some choose to follow the official script. However, I cannot in all conscience pretend that something is true just because it’s convenient to go along with coercion.

    Breaking it down:
    1. Facts – we are denied them.
    2. Coercion – many people who don’t want the vaccine are forced to.
    3. Emotions – the hidden weapon driving most of what is going on.

    Since I can’t change #1 and #2, I find myself focusing on #3.

  18. Regarding one of Jasun’s earlier comments:

    “That the world is going insane is not news; that my comments section is reflecting that insanity is slightly more startling.”

    Indeed – I was thinking the same while reading some of these comments. If it’s any consolation, it appears to be relatively common on other forums/sites that previously encouraged departures from the ‘status quo’.

    I’m in my mid 40s. Live in the NYC area (currently about ~30 miles north of the city), along with my family. I have school-aged children. Thankfully, they have been going to school, albeit part time, and with the damned masks (I had calls with the local superintendent of the public schools here in a futile attempt to make my voice heard. He said all the right things, of course, but is little more than a footsoldier on behalf of State govt mandates). I may well need to relocate in the months ahead as I’m within a state that is one of the most restrictive (though my specific town/area is thankfully not as badly afflicted by the madness: when I step out for a walk or bike ride, most do no wear masks outside, but as I approach a town, the amount of outdoor mask wearers increases in parallel with the overall size of its population. Brainwashing is demonstrably more prevalent in major cities, where the self -identified “liberals” and “leftists” tend to reside).

    I will REFUSE the “vaccine” at every turn, and will do all in my power to prevent my children from ever taking them. There are non-vaccine treatments available that have had very promising results but have been suppressed (for reasons that have little to do with any concern for side effects, to the extent there are any — certainly none that potentially rival those of these vaccines); I anticipate refusal to submit will become more challenging in the months/years ahead; they’re already lining up protocols to make it near-impossible for a non-vaccinated human to travel by air or attend public events without this infernal “passport”.

    I wrote this elsewhere:
    Increasingly, news and social media is ‘rage porn’ for anyone against the lunacy we’re currently enduring. Best option is to simply tune out this white noise, focus on immediate surroundings and community. All else is largely out of our hands.
    …that said, we still need to say “NO” at each turn for anything that goes against core civil liberties. An aggressive version of Bartleby the Scrivener.

    There may be a silver lining in all this: all those that continue to refuse/resist will have the opportunity, hopefully, to migrate to self-sustaining agrarian communities, a modified version of the Amish, perhaps. A different life, to be sure, but I’ll take it over whatever the F they’re attempting to implement. There is still the window of opportunity to stifle it, at least to some degree, but when I look at comments online (and especially when found within sites that previously ‘challenged the status quo narratives), it gets increasingly difficult to believe this will be averted in any meaningful way.

    The likely reality is that it seems the ills of this current zeitgeist will need to be fully expressed. It appears there is a collective subconscious urge to push through this phase right now — though it’s also clear conditioning mechanisms were in place for years to facilitate our current circumstances, and importantly, large-scale complacency/lack of critical thinking.
    Things will likely get worse before they will get better, and there’s a good chance “better” won’t happen, at least not en masse, within our allotted timeframes. But individually, or at the community-level, well-being can be achieved. That’s likely our best bet.

    Jasun dropped a ton of valuable links above. I’m going to include a couple more:

    From the above link:

    …In September 2019, Johns Hopkins in partnership with WHO published a detailed report on “high-impact respiratory pathogens” that is prophetic. For example, they warned NPI (Nonpharmaceutical Interventions) policies could be abused by overreaching governments for political/social purposes, not because of evidence.
    They say widespread quarantine is likely the least effective NPI to do anything, especially if the pathogen is a) airborne, b) highly transmissible. Sound familiar? They mention how the Ebola experience highlights how difficult quarantine policies can be to maintain.
    They urge that every NPI that is considered must also consider any potential harms that could come from the intervention – seeing that it’s well-documented that lockdowns essentially do nothing, we are left with assessing the harms of them, which will be seen for decades to come.
    They also say there is very little information on the effectiveness of masks in the public setting – yet public health leaders in 2020 were so confident in mannequin head droplet studies that they push them as one of the most important and effective interventions we have.
    There are several other reports just like this one. Don’t let political leaders say they “followed the science” when they locked down. They panicked. They’ve spent the past year doubling down on these policies to cover up their failure. No science supported these policies.


    One more, which I don’t believe has been shared yet:

    Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?

  19. (Just realized I inadvertently misspelled my ‘user name’ in my prior commentary above. My Italian ancestors would be displeased.. so I corrected it in this posting)

  20. As I read through this volley of replies I kept looking within myself to sense my reaction to the various perspectives, for some inner sense to reveal itself as to why my own perspective is so firmly planted in opposition to the prevailing narrative of the last year. I’m not insensitive to those who have lost loved ones from illness -my opinion comes with a measure of sadness, a friend I lost last year to the full force of whatever this disease was (is?), who I had played cards with two weeks prior, his final days on a ventilator, alone; His family prevented from saying their farewells in person…unable, by government decree, to provide a proper funeral and burial. These brutal decisions that denied last rites to Ron, his family, and friends, continue to provoke anger in me. I see that fear continues to drive the most awful decisions we as a species make for ourselves and for others. Fear of illness, of death, fear of being ostracized, alone, of being made fun of, fear of isolation, of being wrong. Fear of judgment by others. Fear of pain, of confinement, of poverty, of hunger….truly, fear is the mind killer. It is this Achilles heel we share that is used against us, with weaponized propaganda promoting the largest worldwide product launch in history. Move over New Coke, there’s a new swill to sell.

    I think of death in some manner nearly every day, a tip I got from someone a long time ago, to better consider what it is to be alive. Unfortunately, I now think about being ill quite a bit as well, because that’s all that anyone seems to discuss anymore. My ongoing desire, or goal, is to not fear either death or illness, but to live so that when these eventualities occur, I can stare them down with a solid footing in a life lived as my best expression of gratitude for the gift of being here in this place and time. What a crucible we face! My inner guiding intelligence tells me that my obligation is to strive towards becoming fully conscious, of myself, the world and nature, and the spiritual aspects that have on occasion gifted me with a sign that they certainly exist.

    This for me implies a necessity for constant effort to discern fact from fiction (or propaganda often presented in the guise of marketing). I’m not a doctor or medical researcher, but I have developed some degree of logical deduction and analytical ability. Through trial and error, I have come to a world view that starts off with cynicism and requires of most claims that legendary Missouri sentiment, ‘Show me’. Scientists (used to?) refer to this as the null hypothesis. Having read far more than I care to on the subject at hand, I remain unconvinced of the arguments justifying the overall totalitarian response to CV-19. I could add to the encyclopedic list of links that Jasun provided, including links that show the six-foot distance nonsense was invented by a school girl whose daddy happened to work for Sandia or some other national weapons lab and created a computer model for her to get into college. I could link numerous articles by medical professionals, including quotes by Faux-ci, arguing that masks are of no benefit but instead are harmful to one’s health. I could link the video where Kary Mullis refers to Faux-ci as an idiot. As to the entire efficacy of vaccination, that list of links becomes a novel (apropos, as a work of fiction). Perhaps the internet still has the video of Dr. Hillman from Merck confiding with his cronies about everything wrong with the polio vaccine? SV 40 anyone? Explosive growth in autism, autoimmune / childhood diseases over the past 50 years? Crickets on that, but not for a lack of available information, often from the multinational pharma people themselves, implicating vaccination technology as harmful in various ways.

    To me, the argument can be simplified to the point where claims of benefit become extraordinary, even laughable if the stakes weren’t so high, and require extraordinary proof. Are we to believe that a vial of artificial RNA, created using Crisper technology, guided by computer simulations of what is believed to be the complete CV-19 viral genetic code (still disputed, and as per CDC documentation, ‘not available’), will do for EVERY SINGLE human being on the planet (one size fits all) what each person’s own, individual-specific immune system cannot? This level of medical hubris and arrogant presumption is astounding to me, and would be an interesting case study in medical ethics, if I was not facing the possibility of losing my career, my ability to shop, travel, or congregate in public, etc., etc., as a result of globally coordinated sanctions and injunctions, for not consenting to assault by hypodermic concoctions. It boggles my mind and soul.

    • “I could add to the encyclopedic list of links that Jasun provided”

      That would be useful, Jeff, because the some views are changing, such as countries suspending use of AstraZeneca *after* the European Medical Agency gave it a green light on Thursday, even though the link between the AstraZeneca injection and a rare form of fatal blood clotting in several countries has become obvious and will kill more.

      Such fatal side-effects were not revealed during the drastically shortened and still incomplete trial phases for all covid-19 vaccines. But it can now be stated “the AstraZeneca vaccine will cause death in the young and healthy” which should mean that the word “safe” is no longer used and that all patients should be warned – though I doubt that will happen.

      This is what an informed consent form should include, it’s funny and detailed:

      Dr Malcolm Kendrick is a practicing medical doctor who studies Covid-19 stats and finds them obscured, questionable, unmeaningful and using methods that are not inspectable:

      Note JaHo that UK and Spain standout in the mortality statistics, Sweden does not, according to the Dr MK’s post.

      Assorted quotes of interest from post:

      “No-one will officially provide the data on how many cycles are being done. But it does seem that, in the UK at least, many labs were using forty-five cycles. Now, the numbers of cases are falling, they have reduced PCR processing to thirty cycles. But, who knows? Perhaps it is because they have reduced PCR to thirty cycles, that the cases have gone down. ”

      “These figures simply do not add up. Not even remotely. Medical interventions, sadly, have made very little difference to mortality rates from COVID19. A few percentage points here or there. So that cannot even remotely explain such massive differences.

      What is the other explanation? It is, and can only be, that we cannot possibly be comparing like with like. Which, in turn, means that the figures in one, or all of these countries, are so incomplete, biased or wrong, as to be utterly useless.”

      “Which is that the gold standard for diagnosis of COVID19 is to use a system known as PCR (polymerase chain reaction). We do not use symptoms, or clinical signs, as has been the case for all other diseases known to humanity over the ages. A major problem in itself.”

      “We do know that at least ninety-five per-cent of people who are recorded as dying of COVID19 had other serious medical conditions. Claiming that COVID19 was the primary/recordable cause of death in all of these cases is just ridiculous. Beyond ridiculous.”

  21. challenge accepted Dave!

    regarding the high school sophomore and her .mil dad, who should consider hyphenating their name to plexi-Glass:
    & source paper:

    regarding Dr. Maurice Hilleman of Merck, and SV40:
    Hilleman – on SV40
    (there is a youtube vid as well, requires log-in)

    on the PCR scam:
    Kary Mullis on Fauci (‘he’s a liar…):

    on negative health effects of masks:

  22. If this debate suggests anything to me, it is that this whole covid-psyop has been the most audacious and perhaps the most effective psy-op in history. Given the subject matter of this blog, the fact that “sticking an untested bit of pharmaceutical technology that might kill you or permanently fuck you up in ways that we might not be able to comprehend or imagine” has been defended so very stubbornly by certain parties leads me to think that this sorcery has been even more insidious and spectacular than I already believed.

    One good friend of mine is gradually being ostracized from his family for not wanting the Mark of Caesar. Another hasn’t been ill for ten years, has an extremely high level of health and fitness, and while she wouldn’t take the vaxx herself, her mother has. After visiting her home last weekend, I hear my friend is now feeling “unwell”…

    What kind of horrors will this experiment unleash upon the human race, even those who refuse to take it? Should we even offer to shake hands with the vaxxed? Maybe it’s safer to keep to that six-foot rule around them…

    I was very unsettled by Tom’s strangely Discordian responses, but I was acutely enraged by JIS’s blend of Tolle-esque spiritual fluff and sub-Guardian level science-following. I wouldn’t entirely be surprised if this is the moment the spooks haunting this site have decided to reveal themselves, now that the Endgame is being played.

    On a more optimistic note – economic forecaster Martin Armstrong predicts the Great Reset will crash and burn in 2022, after another “pandemic” (probably delayed vaccine relations blamed on a new magic virus), taking several Western economies with it. Let’s hope. The work will probably be far from done, but hopefully those “green passports” will cease to be viable in the smoking wreckage, even if they manage to avoid incineration, like the ones they found at Ground Zero.

    • “If this debate suggests anything to me, it is that this whole covid-psyop has been the most audacious and perhaps the most effective psy-op in history.” Amen brother. Amen…

      • Amen, too, Ced.

        One of my staunchest supporters on Twitter – always reposting my blog posts and podcasts – has just turned against me because I questioned the health and value of wishing immediate death on all those who’ve taken the vaxx. While I expressed a certain cautious empathy for the sentiment (hey, we’ve all been there), I warned that “the Devil wins when we lose our compassion”.

        Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the liminal with you…

        • That’s just inhumane. I’d rather be proven wrong and made a laughing stock than be in the right. Wouldn’t it be swell if we were just paranoid and the vaccine/s worked as promised? We could all laugh at how silly we were. Instead, at least in part, I’m furious over the fact that people are endangering their health. It brings me no joy. What an odd fella that follower must be.

          Fanatics to the left of me, sadists to the right, here I am, stuck in the untenable position with you…

  23. Conspiracy theory or alternative research or even suppressed mainstream journalism when the dots are connected can often be very compelling and entertaining and a wonderful antidote to mainstream consensus. But, it doesn’t bring clarity to an issue, that much should be obvious. It often shines a light on things that have not been exposed before, and reveals connections that are there but barely seen because they have been repressed. It is a very useful side effect. But drawing firm conclusions seems like an expression of personal preference. It sounds like lots of people here are willing to polarize because their gut is telling them that the other people are wrong and it is escalating the idea that the others are dangerous. I don’t know how guts sit well with that but they seem to be able to. Polarization makes everybody more conservative, its a fact of war. I don’t know how you can declare freedom in a state of total war. It just seems super creepy to find this all degenerating into a celebration of facts that one needs to differentiate based on one’s body responses. As Aleister Crowley once said, don’t confuse good digestion for spirituality.

    • AF said: “It sounds like lots of people here are willing to polarize because their gut is telling them that the other people are wrong and it is escalating the idea that the others are dangerous.”

      It is interesting that you use the word “willing” here as that word has been on my mind a lot recently. Who or what is doing the willing in this case? Is it the true self? the false identity? Or another force?

      It also highlights the shortcomings of this medium — where someone focuses on one aspect to make a particularly point or express a particular feeling, etc. — as if that is all they have to say/think/feel on the subject…

      A misunderstanding unlikely to occur during a real-time conversation (ie actually relating to another human being)

  24. I rang my father just now to wish him a happy Easter and he answers with an unusually small voice. He’s in a lot of pain he says, had a bad reaction to the you’ve guessed it. 84 years old never been sick. Now, sore arms and legs can’t do anything its been four days
    Desperate to talk to the doc but can’t then he says what the hell if I die I die.
    I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

  25. Same as Suzie’s father, my mom got her shots (she was born in ’45) and now has a full body rash that she cannot shake. She does not want to hear my opinion about the vaccine. She says she doesn’t care. A mother of 4 and a grandmother to more. Sigh.


Leave a Comment